Friday, May 29, 2009

The End of The Church Age As We Know It

President of Family Radio Harold Camping is author of an intriguing book, The End of the Church Age…And After. Mr. Camping earnestly believes that God’s “usage of the churches and congregations has come to an end” and he therefore admonishes “each and every believer to leave the church.” Many Christians have rejected Camping’s theology as heretical and would likely label him as an iconoclast. Although I remain uncertain that the Church Era has come to a complete end, I believe that Mr. Camping’s theory is not altogether plausible. Many denominations have departed from the Bible and have developed their own agenda. I will provide a few succinct examples:

Musical Standards: Many mega churches have become places of entertainment with musical standards irreverently tantamount to a rock concert. Traditional hymns have been replaced with overhead projectors flashing verses on a screen, similar to a second-grade handwriting lesson. Congregants may sing, “I am not worthy” or “Your Name is Jesus” four-five times in a row. There seems to be a dearth of substance and creativity. Feminizing and Gender-Neutralizing of Hymnals: I perused a copy of The United Methodist Hymnal (1989) and discovered that many of the words of some of my favorite hymns have been altered. “Good Christian Men Rejoice” is now “Good Christian Friends Rejoice.” The refrain in the hymn, “All Creatures of Our God and King” states, “O praise ye!” rather than “O Praise Him!” and in the third verse one would sing, “O sister water, flowing clear” instead of “Thou flowing water, pure and clear.” The popular hymn, “He Lives” states in the latest version: “I know that he is living, whatever foes may say” and the original wording specified “I know that he is living whatever men may say.” There are directions left from John Wesley in the very first few pages of every United Methodist Hymnal. What would Wesley think of these politically correct adjustments when he states to sing the hymns “exactly as they are printed here, without altering or mending them at all; and if you have learned to sing them otherwise, unlearn it as soon as you can”?

Tolerating the Intolerable:In An Introduction to the Episcopal Church author Joseph Bernardin claims that the “traditional attitude towards sex, based on the Bible, is under strong ethical challenge today.” He then states that “heterosexual intercourse between unmarried persons (fornication), with mutual consent and proper precautions against procreation and disease, is a private matter.” Bernardin directly controverts Scripture again when he contends that “This applies also to homosexual intercourse between mature consentient persons. Homosexuality itself is neither a sin nor a disease, but a condition for which the person himself is in no wise responsible.” The Episcopal Church, the oldest Protestant faith in North America, has been apostate for years. It was not a surprise that the first openly homosexual bishop, (and surely not the last) Gene Robinson, was recently confirmed as Bishop Shelby Spong and other Church leaders have justified the ordination of homosexual priests.

A Myriad of Child-Sex Abuse Cases:The Roman Catholic Church is also in a state of crisis. Over a hundred of people have come forward with egregious childhood tales of sexual abuse over a period of several decades in the Greater Boston area alone. The figure could be over a thousand nationwide. Cardinal Bernard Law and other church officials have been severely criticized for coddling abusive priests and permitting them to surreptitiously molest children again while paying off their victims. Such actions only reflect abysmal, degenerating, and morally bankrupt leadership.

Morally Corrupt Preaching Within: Many pastors are reticent to speak from the pulpit about the polemics of our day such as abortion, homosexuality, fornication, divorce, racism, cohabitation, and other issues. Furthermore, pastors often avoid other subjects like hell and eternal damnation, subjects that make congregants uncomfortable. Rather, there is an over emphasis on refraining from judgment, receiving the love of God, and tithing, as if that is to systematically guarantee financial stability in this transitory life.Church Attendance Down Nationwide:There used to be a time in this great nation where church attendance was deemed essential to good citizenship. Sunday was a day for worship and prayer when families spent time together and did not go grocery shopping or pertain to other picayune duties. Church leaders were bold and would challenge members with incisive and profound preaching. I have read that President Theodore Roosevelt would spend an hour every Sunday evening with his father discussing the sermon that he had learned that morning. I know of Christians who seem to be unable to recall even the content of a sermon as early as Monday morning! Try asking some people who attend church regularly what they learned a day or two afterwards and I believe that the results would be quite appalling.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

President Obama at Notre Dame: More Words and the Death Count Rises

The middle to the end of May marks the time of spring graduation for many colleges and universities in the United States. For the institutions with the big name, getting the speaker with a big name is a big deal. As I compose this essay, quite a few institutions have already held their ceremony, including the University of Notre Dame which had President Barack Obama as the guest speaker and also as a recipient of an honorary degree. Even before Obama’s arrival in South Bend, Indiana, the president’s scheduled appearance at Notre Dame on Sunday, 17 May 2009, had generated protests. At issue was whether a Catholic, pro-life institution should extend an invitation to and an honor upon a pro-choice person. An analysis of his speech, as well as a consideration of contemporary realities, shows why there should be controversy.

The speech, considered by many commentators to be erudite and the perfect presentation for an academic setting, lasted just over 30 minutes. To be sure, the speech was filled with mellifluent phrases that inspired the audience to rise many times in standing ovations. However, during the time it took the president to deliver his oration, approximately another sixty-eight babies were aborted. (The tally is derived from the number of abortions [1,200,000] given for 2005 by the Guttmacher Institute and divided by the number of minutes in a year of 365 days and then multiplied by the number of minutes in Obama’s speech.) Talking on and on and on about abortion while about-to-be-born Americans are killed is not a solution; it is tacit acceptance of the slaughter of babies. The president’s pathetic imperceptivity on the matter is seen in this comment: "I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away." In effect, those that have been born are encouraged to talk while some that are about to be born are aborted during pregnancy.

Pro-choice persons, like Obama, try to assume some sort of moral high ground by pronouncing the following kind of statement: "Maybe we won’t agree on abortion, but we can still agree that this is a heart-wrenching decision for any woman to make, with both moral and spiritual dimensions." A second one that is routinely tossed into national dialogue on abortion, and which Obama used at Notre Dame, is: "Let’s…make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded in clear ethics and sound science, as well as respect for the equality of women." Amidst vague verbiage through the use of words, like "moral" and "spiritual" and "clear ethics," Obama shifts the entire focus to women as if no one else is involved. For a pregnant woman there is at least one more person involved as she makes her "heart-wrenching decision." That person is the one who is about to be born, but about whom Obama said nothing in his commencement address.

The president closed his speech with references to events in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and the 1960s. He mentioned "freedom rides" and "lunch counters" and "a Civil Rights Commission appointed by President Eisenhower." Obama used that last item to illustrate his belief that persons of dissimilar views and backgrounds "can…make a difference in the lives of those with whom we share the same brief moment on this Earth." What Obama did not highlight in his speech is that the federal government used force through federal legislation and the enforcement of laws "to fully realize the dream of civil rights for all God’s children." What many pro-life persons want from the government is a similar use of laws and the enforcement of laws to "to fully realize the dream of" life "for all God’s children." If the federal and several state governments can protect the bald eagle by making it a crime to destroy the egg, it can do at least as much for the human fetus.

According to his own words, delivered at Notre Dame, Obama believes "the law that binds people of all faiths and no faith together" is "the Golden Rule," wherein we "treat one another as we wish to be treated." As a general, universal rule people do not want to have their limbs ripped off or a caustic solution poured on their skin or their brain sucked out of their head with a powerful vacuum, but the aforementioned procedures and other horrific methods have been used to abort more than fifty million about-to-be-born Americans since Roe v. Wade was declared by the Supreme Court to be constitutional in 1973.

Finally, in his commencement address on Sunday, May 17, the president urged that Americans "work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies, and making adoption more available, and providing care and support for women who do carry their child to term." Again, these mellifluent phrases, even if incomplete in what they should proffer, convey good sentiments. If an Obama Administration and a Congress controlled by the Democrats can contribute hundreds and hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars for the bailouts of mortgages institutions and other corporations, it should be able to provide some assistance to pregnant women and about-to-be-born persons.

George Sochan
Assistant Professor
Bowie State University
26 May 2009